Women Are From Imago, Men Are From Medulla

According to the inventors of the Imago Therapy pseudo-psychological counseling technique, the Imago is “the person who can make us whole.” This is akin to the psychological meaning of “an idealized image of a person.” Living life as an image of your true self and looking to others to make your true self whole—this is the home planet for women. Imago is a gas giant and by virtue of the Birkeland currents it generates, its force field extends through many parsecs of space. The light, airy nature of Imago is the source of the goddess essence that characterizes females. The entire surface of the planet is covered with arenas where adoring crowds, wearing their most chic skinny jeans, watch the goddesses run with wolves. Those who beat the wolves remain on Imago. Those who are beaten by the wolves, now victimized by defeat, are sent to Earth to be made whole.

The home planet for men is Medulla, a spinning ball of rock tectonically gyrating to the relentless beat of autonomic drums. True to the Greek derived words that describe them, “self law”, this planet does not affect the space around it, in defiance of Einstein’s erroneous SpaceTime pure mathematical construct. The flinty core and the relentless, rhythmic continental drift of its surface is the responsible for the steady ejections that send whole men to Earth to reach beyond themselves and learn the limits of self law.

All the while, marketing experts on Earth, aware of the true planetary origins of Earthlings, have devised successful campaigns to appeal to the essences of their audiences. The images they present to women are never real women because actual women do not want to see themselves, they want to see the imago of themselves. They fear that their true reality will somehow not measure up so they seek an idol of themselves that will make them whole, that will return some element of feminine grace that was stolen from them when they were girls. Savvy advertisers sell images of personal growth and spiritual fulfillment to women whom they know feel incomplete and dissatisfied. Such a strategy assures a continuing revenue stream.

To men, crafty sellers present images of the virtue of self law yet hint that there is something valuable just outside its sphere. The valuable thing is, of course, a woman. What self law needs to get a woman, these snake oil sellers contend, is a powerful new car, success in demonstrable practical arts, which the right tools will bring, peer group favor, which social conformity brings, and above all, a willingness to suspend self law in order to go beyond it to get the goods that get the goods.

Should society ever admit that each human is born whole and with self law, our markets would collapse and we would fall into an economic depression. It would however be a depression of elation because a man could find a woman, and a woman could find a man, solely on the basis of love, enhanced by character and spirit. The social sciences would suffer a minor dislocation but would find new things about which to collect “data”, about which nothing could be conclusively said.

Posted in Society, Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Our Fathers In Flanders

Beneath rows of tidy white crosses, they lie in Flanders, those fathers whose messy deaths shocked the world. Felled by bullets, blown apart by exploding artillery shells, gasping for a last breath through plum-colored lips after the yellowish green clouds of white star gas enveloped them, screaming with pain as blood rushed from their noses while their faces and limbs erupted in painful blisters after being awash in mustard gas, they expired in an agonizingly slow personal hell. Wracked by pain, seized by terror, mired in mud, their hearts and minds formed their last images of and emotions for wives and children far across the ocean sea. Reduced to beasts by abject misery, beyond the reach of love, they left this world forever.

Red poppies grow in the old killing field and wave in the gentle breezes that cross the verdant Belgian meadow. Far from tranquil, these blood-colored blossoms herald the suffering that took place here and away from these fields, the diminished lives of grieving widows and the fractured lives of fatherless children. White crosses mark the places of fathers, killed here during the Great War, who can never rest because they were not buried by their children. Society erects no monuments to the loss of fatherhood that occurred during the first worldwide slaughter of the twentieth century. Society only recognized and mourned the loss on the battlefield.

In the twenty-first century, fatherhood has finally lost all trappings of meaningful reality and is represented only as a “sociological” entity about which pseudo-scientists collect “data” and pointlessly discuss the “implications” of their “research”. This phenomenon of treating fatherhood as if belonged to society like some iconic token is reminiscent of the medieval Scholastics who debated how many angels could dance on the head of a pin while real devils ravaged society. These devils now crawl like dung beetles over our decaying society.

The proof that fatherhood has no vital meaning in our society is given by how we treat its loss. Should combat in Iraq or Afghanistan take a father away from his wife and children, that story is covered on the evening national news by witless reporters who think that lowering their voices during a reading of copy is the same thing as reverence. War orphans and war widows have support groups and “activist” organizations bemoaning the lack of fathers in their lives. However, should a child be made fatherless by the choice of a woman to have a child without a father, nobody mourns the loss of fatherhood. The most stupid members of society, who are also very vocal because stupidity is not punished  by society, actually applaud. Even in our depraved society, a woman is still not a man, so a father’s love is different from a mother’s love.

But it is not less.

What was lost when the soldiers perished in Flanders was the love of half a million fathers. Our femo-centric society and quantizing pseudo-scientific social tabulators have no discourse on the significance of the lush field of red poppies that grow quite well in an overly green hallowed field in Flanders.

Posted in Fatherhood | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

The Estrangement Of The Rain God, Second Edition

My First Novel

My novel, The Estrangement of the Rain God, is my story of The Outside Half Of Divorce. The second edition is now available from Righter Publishing. My book will help you deal with your Outside Story. Buy it for yourself, recommend it to your buddies in a similar fix, suggest it to friends in book clubs and bring it to the attention of your divorce lawyer and her divorce lawyer.

Buy Michael Warren’s novel The Estrangement Of The Rain God now!

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Swimming With Dolphins Does Not Make You Prettier


In my first novel, THE ESTRANGEMENT OF THE RAIN GOD, 2nd. Edition, I said this: “Love is the only truly precious thing we humans have.” Love is an essential aspect of the human spirit and a fundamental component of the human condition. Much of human culture and history has been occasioned by the pursuit, satisfaction, dissolution or conflict of questers for love.

Despite the obvious gravitas of love, the pursuit of it in our time has been hampered by the yen for status and approval. Because of electronic communication, social desirability has infected the blood quest for romance. Long ago, social desirability was implicit in the pursuit of love because of social conditions. The wizardry of the Internet offered the technology to admix social approval and social status into the hunt for romance as an explicit dimension of personal appeal. Much to my chagrin, we have done so.

In the rigid days of yore (back in the day), the stratification of society would not have allowed a poor stable boy to pursue romance with the beautiful daughter of a man of means. The conditions of his labor and the functions of her station would have never given them the chance to meet in order to assess physical desirability. Even accidental acquaintance would not have led to any relationship because the machinations of society would not have afforded them any privacy.

Social strata were crumbled beneath the weight of democratic forces that began with the Renaissance and people from different walks of life were able to mingle more easily. Modernity accelerated this trend with improved transportation and mass communication. Still, acquaintanceship required the proximate physical appearance of both parties.

Enter electronic whizbangs. Now, with a few computer keystrokes, a fireman in Cincinnati can attempt to woo a masseuse in Sheboygan  by simply forwarding to her some text and photographs. Verbiage and images are surrogates for actual presence until the two move past electronic engagement to a physical encounter of some sort. The potential romantic couple will only conquer time and distance to meet face-to-face if the electronic titillation is sufficiently seductive.

Since words and images are allowed to be extremely explicit, you would think that women would use the textual portion of their electronic foreplay to highlight their mental capacities and the imaging component of the networked flirtation to emphasize their physical attributes in the best light.

You would be wrong. The majority of women using online dating sites generate prosaic text so trivial that it hides their natural lights under a bushel basket. They seem to forget that the eyes are not the mirrors of the soul, words are the reflectors of your noodle. They seem to ignore the fact that they are trying to get the attention of a man. Explicating the obvious is no barrier to these women.

They say they like the beach. Who doesn’t? They say they like to watch sunsets. Who doesn’t? They say they like to cuddle. Who doesn’t? They say they are caring. Who isn’t. My personal favorite: they say they are open-minded.  Really? Wow! What if I said your most sacred belief was crap. Are you open to that? Can you wrap your mind around that? As long as there is truth in this world, nobody—and I mean nobody—can claim, without shame, to be open-minded.

Women waste their textual space on banality  because their desire for social acceptability when exposed to the public is great. They don’t even realize that the only thing their vanilla words communicate to a man is that they are willing to use them in pursuit of a lover. If these behaving women said they would enjoy setting fire to a basket of puppies, that would actually tell a man something about them.

Such women similarly squander their imaging capacity. Instead of focusing on their physical attributes, they try to incorporate social desirability into their photos. To placate their feminist cronies, some women try to make it appear that they are not actually not trying to attract a man. Photos of them are taken at great distances, they stand in shadow, they disguise their physique with baggy, frumpy clothes or they are diminutive against an enormous background.

To appease their sense of insecurity, these women show themselves in art galleries, seemingly assessing a piece of sculpture, sitting a horse, swinging a golf club, opening the door of a Mustang convertible or swimming with dolphins.

Ladies, swimming with dolphins does not make you prettier, or smarter, or more distinctive than the next gal. A dolphin is a fish, not the mammal you think it is, and cannot enhance your pulchritude. That you succumb to trends is all your dolphin friends lend to the portrayal of you.

I am going to tell you an ancient secret about men: feminine beauty lies solely in the face; feminine desirability resides singularly in the body; romantic awe is driven by feminine beauty, feminine desirability, feminine intelligence, feminine style and feminine grace. These are the things you must project in your dating profiles and social desirability is not among them.

Swim not with dolphins when fishing for love, for you know not what you do.

Posted in Society | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

What Your Mother Never Told You About Dating Profiles

I met two of my four ex-wives through dating services. I say dating services, because when I met my third ex, the Internet did not exist. But personal ads did, and voila! Thirteen and half years later, when I was looking to meet another woman, online dating sites were going strong. I mention this only to indicate that I have had a lot of experience with online dating sites and have seen thousands of women’s profiles.

Fortunately, many women create excellent profiles for dating sites. Less sanguine are the multitudes of women who seem lost when creating a profile that is intended to bring them the attention of a man. What follows are the mistakes I see in such profiles, in no particular order.

CUTENESS: Men have no conception, and therefore no appreciation for, cute. In the presence of women, men sometimes falsely confess that they understand cute. But no man is attracted to cute. Cute profile backgrounds, cute photo composition, pictures of you in a cute costume for Halloween, community theatre, or your kid’s school function, are not appealing to men.

YOUTH: Men know what a young woman looks like. They can see it a mile away. Regardless of what your female friends tell you when you’ve “had work done”, you never look younger to a man. You look exactly like an older woman who has had work done. After all, you don’t do your ear lobes, you don’t do your neck down to and through your cleavage, you don’t do your hands. Regardless of how much you pay your plastician or how talented your plastician is, you will always have that Joan Rivers and Kenny Rogers look to a man. Never on this planet has there walked a “youngish 50″ female. Men know that hearts do not age. Saying you are “young at heart” just sounds dumb.

CLEVERNESS: Attempting to display cleverness to men you have not met is foolish and usually disastrous. In the context of a conversation, where you can assess the intelligence of the man you are talking with, cleverness is much appreciated by men. When you cannot assess the mind of the recipient of your wit, you run the risk of not being clever to that mind. Clever usernames, cleverness in describing yourself and cleverness in initial flirtation messages should be avoided. Once you click, your cleverness will come naturally and will be appropriate. Attempts to contrive cleverness for an unknown audience is ill-advised.

PHOTOS: Your dating profile is a legitimate venue for EVERYTHING TO BE ALL ABOUT YOU. Whatever your looks, stunning to stodgy, having your gal pals in the photo DOES NOT HELP YOU. Having your daughter in the photo is just plain crazy: a younger version of you can only make you look older. Posing with your children makes you look motherly. Men do not want to bed or wed their mothers. Men do not want to see your f-ing cats! Add dogs, birds, fish, snakes, cars, boats, national parks, museums, or ANYTHING THAT SUGGEST YOGA, to the list of what to exclude from your photos. You know what about you men want to see. Your mothers did tell you that. Show them what you know they want to see, in focus and well-lit. In photos, show them nothing else.

EMPATHY: Men take your empathy for granted. After all, women are human. Touting it always makes you look shallow. Men do not care how much you volunteer or for whom your spare time is given. Caring for others does not mean you will care for the man when he needs it most. The cobbler’s children have no shoes.

LOW SELF-ESTEEM: More than any other aspect of a dating profile, this is where most women make a mistake. If you radiate low self-esteem, you will only attract men with low self-esteem. You project low self-esteem when you reveal how many times your heart has been broken, you talk about “waiting” for love, you use the term “Mr. Right”, you display your body art, you show your ankle bracelet, you talk about self-help books, you use the word “abuse”,  you use the word “luv”, your face is in shadow, you are standing a mile away, you do not show your body head to toe, you show excessive devotion to kids, plants or pets; you talk about “meditation”, you talk about being “spiritual”, you talk about your personal “path” or “journey”; you talk about not “settling”. All of these scream low self-esteem.

In short ladies, in your dating profiles, make it all about you, the real you. Show your passion and enthusiasm for life. A man of similar spirit will take notice.

All else is folly, very lonely folly.

Posted in Society | Tagged | Leave a comment

What Women Really Want From A Man

Men have the undeserved reputation of wanting only one thing from a woman. While untrue, it sheds light on what women really want from a man. Women have either been undersold or oversold by their mothers on the power of sex between the sexes that their greatest fear is that their hearts will never emerge and be treasured by men. What they want is simple: they want nature to take its powerful course and in that passionate process for their man to seek their heart, share in its joys, and treasure its preciousness.

Posted in Society | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Looking For Pussy On Redroom.com

When you first take a notion to look for pussy on Redroom.com, it seems like a good idea, on a par with going into a martini bar with a cigar, a leather-bound journal and a gleaming retractable fountain pen. After all, this writers’ site is populated mostly by chicks who, by putting up profiles and interacting on the site, are shouting their intellectual and creative credentials from the red rooftops, even though they will shamelessly deny they are.

Going in, you know these Redroom.com chicks are either going to be young Bohemian babes with slick, fluid credit cards; older broads with bags and baggage other than by Vuitton and drier, coarser cash flow; or the ultimate sweet spot: accomplished females with viscous bank accounts and a genuine itch for a thoroughly modern man to get in their britches.

Of course, in such an environment, I am at a distinct disadvantage. I have a sixth-century world view, something akin to Beowulf extolling Aristotle. Though I eschew the Renaissance and modernity, my instinct for pussy is powerful. Since I served my country by smiting its enemies, my renown should serve me well in ravishing female denizens, including Grendel’s mother, should she show some leg during my harrowing.

Alas, when you enter Redroom.com and search for pussy, the results are astounding. Instead of a cornucopia of lovely, eager, interesting females issuing forth, you are beset by a trickle of milquetoast men calling each other pussies or droning crones rhapsodizing about their fled glory holes.

Ecce Homo.

Throughout this howling wasteland—from which there is no exit—no lush swale beckons an old warrior to honestly search for pussy within its fragrant folds. Lo! I cease this Philippic. The dragon comes!

Posted in Society | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Intransitive Friendship

When I finished my doctoral work at Drexel University, I returned to my adopted town in North Carolina and took a faculty position at the university. I soon met Dr. D, who had just come from Temple. Quickly, we became personal friends. He was an inveterate home remodeler and I had just purchased the godstead and it came with an old house that needed some work. Whereas I had no intention of restoring my old Greek Revival farmhouse, Dr. D was forever displeased with his abode and was not completely happy unless we was tearing something out or adding something new.

We exchanged labor but it was not a balanced sheet because his projects never ended and mine were easily complete enough. His home was a fashionable house in an old college neighborhood and my home was a modest structure on the very edge of town, complete with a small stock pond, a four-stall horse barn and fenced acreage. I did not mind the inequality of work because, among our friends, our intellectual exchanges were legendary. It was a great disappointment to me that our universities are filled with mere academics and scholastics, rather than intellectuals, and I rage that storm against Dr. D.

Supper with Dr. D followed a predictable pattern. My second wife and I would arrive in the middle of the afternoon on a Saturday, help Dr. D and his wife strip wallpaper,  tape a room for painting or sand fresh drywall. At six-thirty, we would all retire to the kitchen for a glass of wine and to begin putting supper together. The meal was set out on the dining room table and we began a leisurely repast that always concluded with a fabulous dessert. I always steered supper conversation away from shop talk. We discussed world events, local scandals and our personal dreams. When Dr. D’s daughter came along, followed rapidly by my son and then my daughter, the pattern changed little except that I spend less time at the table and more time in the yard playing with the kids.

Away from the table, Dr. D and I discussed our mutual intellectual interests, trout fishing and, of course, home improvement. As it turned out, my interest in remodeling was largely theoretical, as was his interest in trout fishing. He fished occasionally, as an adjunct to wilderness hiking and mountain climbing. I went into the wilderness regularly to pursue wild trout. He fiddled with the internal architecture of his domicile constantly. I did the minimum to make a house a home.

Dr. D and his wife bought a second home in Colorado and he indulged in his yen for hammer and paint in that home. Every summer now they spent in Colorado. Dr. D said that going to Colorado let him escape from his life and relish paradise for a while. When my friend told me he was moving to Colorado, I ardently advised him against it. I reminded him that he took refuge from his life in Colorado. I told him that he was not the type who could actually live in paradise.

They moved to Colorado and reported that life in paradise was fine. When I went out to visit, I discovered that Dr. D and his wife were splitting up. I was shaken to the bone. They had always seemed rock solid. Little did I know that within two years, I would suffer the same fate.

Dr. D’s divorce crushed him and he started putting his grief up his nose. I encouraged him to let go of his bitterness, but to no avail. His dark Scandinavian nature clung to his great sorrow. In time, he met a great woman, fell in love and got engaged. I went out to Colorado for the wedding. I met his new wife and renewed my relationship with his daughter.

As the years went by, Dr. D and his second wife seemed very happy. I had a third wife and then a fourth. One evening, Dr. D called me—I knew by his speech pattern that he was high—and informed me in a quavering voice that he had lung cancer. He was very upbeat and said that his university health plan would give him the very best medical treatment. Over the next year, reports from Dr. D indicated that the treatments were going well and that the tumors were shrinking.

Several months later, my daughter told me that she had found out via one of Dr. D’s daughter’s Facebook postings that Dr. D was dead. I was astounded. His wife and his daughter knew that Dr. D and I were close friends. In my folk art way, I created a sympathy card that featured Dr. D’s beloved mountains and included a heartfelt verse about losing a good friend and a good man. Several weeks later, the card was returned with a forwarding address indicated. I sent the card to the new address. I never heard from Dr. D’s wife or daughter. They never told me he had died. They never acknowledged my card.

My 30-year friendship with Dr. D, one of my closest friends,  had not—in all those suppers, shared labors, mutual visits, attendance at his second wedding– transferred to his daughter and his second wife. I was astounded and deeply saddened. Had my daughter not been a Facebook user, I would have never known that Dr. D was dead. In a world webbed with electronic communication, my long friendship with Dr. D did not even garner so much as an email upon his death.

My children know who my close friends are. They have been involved in the lives of my close friends. I hope that, upon my death, my children will care for those who have cared for me, because my friends, in welcoming me into their hearts, have also welcomed my children.

Posted in Society | Tagged , | Leave a comment

When Summer Was Bliss

When I was a kid, most parents were too poor to control their kids’ lives. WWII had just ended and the post-war economic boom had not yet begun. Most mothers were in the kitchen and most fathers had greasy, calloused hands and wore clothes with barely perceptible stains. Dads were so busy trying to earn enough money, and moms were so occupied with maintaining a household, that children were actually free to live in their own world.

Before the sixties unleashed the Age Of Parental Tyranny, which continues until this very day, kids grew up in a kid’s world where pirates and Indians were very real and careers, social climbing and summer camps were not. Kids were released from the omnipresent stables of adult dominion—school—by the arrival of summer.

The very word was magical. Summer. Mellifluous, soft, golden sounding, hopeful, and suggesting adventure, this name of the season rang in a child’s mind as the very anthem of freedom. Calendar pages of timeless days beckoned, days filled with personal glory in the peer realm of your neighborhood. Loosed from the spiritless shackles of the droning adult world, brimming imagination was your constant companion.

Junkyards, old factories, shady creeks and shadowed woods were ripe for exploration. Blackberries and plums awaited picking and the railroad safari could at last be undertaken. Following the steel tracks through Middle Earth—veins of rarely examined ground that provided secret passage through AdultLand—uprooted railroad spikes were eagerly sought. Detritus from the overlords—soiled panties, weathered rubbers, cracked whisky bottles, empty snuff cans and rusted sardine tins—intermittently punctured the serenity of the hunt.

There were long, green catalpa pods to harvest and dry on the roof until these prized Indian cigars were ready to smoke. Fields of rabbit tobacco had to be located so that one could return in August, after the leaves had turned silvery green in color, and pull great bunches of the plant for curing in an old, neglected garage. By the time summer ended in September, a stash of dried leaves was ready to smoke. Days of fishing for feisty shellcrackers, endless afternoons of baseball,  and long nights of wandering the neighborhood,  kept us out the habitual paths of the grownups.

Using an old wooden dope (soda pop) crate and empty Dr. Pepper bottles, we fermented black cherries in the crawlspaces of our houses for consumption in July. The legal age of consent in my state was fourteen but many girls consented earlier than that and most girls would play strip poker with us in our fort in the woods. In passion and glory, we rode the wild steeds of our fantasy and desire under the summer sun, free from the machinations of society that would soon enough ensnare us.

The prosperity of the sixties gutted the bliss of summer.

Adults were given ample supplies of that most burdensome tonic—free time—and they used it to invade the world of their children. Children playing of themselves (show me yours and I will show you mine), by themselves (in castles, on the Spanish main, leading the charge) and for themselves (that red-haired girl who sits near the teacher’s desk) have perished from the earth. The marauders have bound them up in Children’s Activities. They shall never know bliss again.

Dance classes that constitute barely controlled motion, music recitals that recite discord, martial arts instruction for the offspring of parents who do not believe in war, soccer games that prove that nobody can be a winner, space camp for kids who have never been out of their own yards, computer camps that explicate the electronic obvious, summer camps with exotic names of the violently vanquished—these are the hostile forces that overwhelmed defenseless children as they innocently raged in Kinder-Welt.

Memorial Day has become such a shallow event that it no longer honors those who have fallen in battle. In our time, Memorial Day commemorates those children who have fallen, and continue to fall, from the bliss of summer into the intractable, grinding parade of status and ego that is, in fact, the remonstrance of their parents’ lives of pleasance. For those parents, puzzled at their own angst, summer is, well, increasingly inappropriate.  Soon, they will form progressive organizations to do away with it once and for all.

Posted in Society | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Ex Facto Post

My fourth ex-wife maintains blogs that document contemporaneous moments in her life. Reviewing her previous posts, I come to a period when, as she did in one of her books, she speaks fondly of me. It is then, with a chill, I experience being ex facto post: a vital reality, gutted of meaning, nailed to a tottering old barn that will not fall down. I have no poignancy for her now but these earlier posts, like the dusty calendar that hangs in an unused shed, testify to a time when I did.

There was no world of electronic artifacts when my first wife bid me farewell. Such a world was a fledgling when my second wife pushed the eject button. Digital life simulation was in full swing when my third wife took the exit ramp but she was not a digitizer. Only my fourth ex-wife has committed a smattering of what we were to the vast web where the carcasses of the dead can appear—for a second or two—to be alive.

Memories are freshened in an instant—as are the desiccated sands of sorrow.

Photographs, old letters and memorabilia can also precipitate instantaneous emotional prominences but something in their context—the color of color, the texture of paper, the mode of design—forewarns that what beckons is past, is no longer real, cannot be held, is past loving, is, no matter the ecstasy nor felicity, utterly lost and fled from desire.

Not so the blog. It slugs you in the gut like a fat slice of now and the props pack as much wallop as the recounting. In the home you shared, she sits on the couch where you once took her in the manner women deeply crave, she holds the cat that, though hers, always slept on your feet. Behind her are the gas logs you lit when the evening smacked of romance. She wears the necklace you gave her.

Digital is the cruelest form for it manifests the past currently. The current past is not a Rubicon you may cross. It is a sun-dappled, gurgling, mineral-scented stream where once your brimming heart drowned.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Control Government, Not Guns

Control Government, Not Guns

 

Even though children were murdered at Sandy Hook elementary school in Newtown, Connecticut, the total lack of any journalistic standards in the American news media and the crass opportunism of fools on both sides of the gun control issue, conspired to produce The Standard Circus. In the center ring, reporters stoop to asking people how they feel about children being murdered. In the left ring, politicians wring their hands and declare that more must be done to control gun violence. In the right ring, politicians declare that nothing more can be done to control gun violence. Under the American Infotainment Big Top, not a single word of genuine outrage or true sorrow was spoken.

 

The stage was set for Buffoon H. Obama to lecture the world on righteousness and attempt to increase federal power even more—and he did. While the innocent children grow cold in their graves, jaws flap relentlessly under the Big Top. “Gun control, gun control, sis boom bah. Get rid of guns and bring forth Shangri-La. Gun control, gun control, bippity, boppity, boo. Give up your guns—your government will always do right by you.”

 

During every hour, on every single channel, the circus plays on inexorably. Glitz, glamor, pop, sparkle, look sad, we’re on the air. Expunge all meaning with trite expressions and the wails of the living. Make sonorous speeches but make sure that the photos that capture the most anguish get the most air. Pack up the Big Top and get ready to roll. When tragedy again strikes, we must be ready with our mikes. Besides, the news cycle has moved beyond these poor tykes.

 

The process by which the Big Top turns true horror into media content is appalling and disheartening. The surety with which politicians turn unspeakable sorrow into government control is chilling. The irony is that a very serious matter is at stake and not a single partisan of either side, especially Buffoon H. Obama, knows what it is.

 

Although, as the Supreme Court, recently made clear, the Second Amendment does confer a personal right to keep and bear arms, that is not the purpose of the amendment.

 

“A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.”

 

Read it carefully and actually think about each word. The security of a free State is the issue here. Arming the citizens is the method of guaranteeing that security.

 

The purpose of the Second Amendment is to make sure that each State can protect itself from other States and from the federal government. The only way that could be done, as the Founders realized, was for the people in the States to be armed. A consequence of the Second Amendment is that the people will always have the means to, as Jefferson thought necessary, revolt once in a while.

 

Read the record of the debates during the Constitutional Convention. States were jealous of the power of other States and very fearful of the power of the new federal government they were creating. From the beginning of the Constitutional Convention, the States were concerned about having the power to repel other States and the federal government from their borders. To give themselves this power forever, the States added the Second Amendment to assure themselves of armed citizens. Armed citizens had been the means through which the States had won their freedom.

 

The government has guns that can fire 5,000 rounds per minute. That same government wants to restrict those who would oppose them to clips that hold seven rounds or less. This ridiculous balance of power is tolerated because Americans, despite clear warnings from our most important Founders, refuse to accept that revolution against or repulsion of, the federal government will ever be necessary again. The sad truth is, revolution is required now.

 

The control America desperately needs now is the control of government, not control of arms in the hands of its citizens. The deranged will always be able to wound society but it is only tyrannical governments that can destroy society. The Second Amendment exists so States may protect themselves. It is high time they began to do so.

My First Novel

Buy Michael Warren’s novel The Estrangement Of The Rain God now!

 

Posted in Society | Leave a comment